June 13, 2010

Multi Directional Growth

The growth in the biologics and oncology segments, penetration of health insurance, government support and the need for more efficacious products will set the wheels turning for the injectables and parenterals market. Arshiya Khan considers a few deals that may encourage MNCs to collaborate with Indian companies

While the concept of injectables was revolutionary when discovered, the innovation in this segment has been evolutionary. Drug delivery systems with various biotechnology drugs have brought new innovations in the industry. Also, the kinds of deals witnessed in this segment are indicators of the prospects that lie in this area. Indian players have made themselves regulatory compliant to attract the world markets. According to IndiaVenture Advisors, the total Indian market for injectables has been estimated at about Rs 6,500 crore for FY09. The total domestic injectables market is estimated at about $450 million and was estimated to have grown at more than 20 percent in the last three years.

Deals galore

The Hospira-Orchid and Pfizer-Strides or Pfizer-Claris deals indicate that the injectables and parenterals market is in tumult. MNCs are closely monitoring the market changes in this segment. Likewise, a number of Indian pharma companies have successfully gained FDA approval for a growing portfolio of injectables generics, to gain foothold in the US generics market.

Vikram Gupta, Chief Operating Officer, IndiaVenture Advisors remarks, international markets where generics injectables have a huge market share include US, Germany and UK. These countries have seen maximum penetration of generic injectables in the oncology area. However, there are European markets such as Spain and Italy, where generic penetration is still low. In case of US, the generic penetration is about 65 percent by volume and 45 percent by value and continues to grow.

"This relatively exclusive segment of the generics market appears to be gaining traction, which has become evident with Hospira and Pfizer increasing their market shares by doing deals with Indian manufacturers," agrees Sujay Shetty, Associate Director, Pharma Practice, PricewaterhouseCoopers.

He cites another example: last year Hospira acquired Orchid's generic injectable finished-dosage form pharma business for approximately $400 million. The acquisition included Orchid's beta-lactam antibiotics manufacturing complex and R&D facility at Chennai, as well as its generic injectable product portfolio and pipeline. In addition, the companies signed a long-term agreement for Orchid to supply APIs for the acquired generic injectable pharma business.

In another such deal, Pfizer and Strides Arcolab entered into a collaboration whereby Pfizer agreed to commercialise Stride's off-patent sterile injectables and oral products in the US through its Established Products Business Unit. This is a highly complementary collaboration, expected to deliver 40 off-patent products, many of which are oncology therapeutics, to healthcare providers and patients in the US, by joining Pfizer's solid commercial infrastructure with Strides' high-quality manufacturing capabilities.

These deals are signs that, "MNC players like Pfizer are keen to work with Indian manufacturers to provide a boost to the injectable generics market," as Shetty underlines. Besides this, last May Pfizer also signed a commercialisation agreement with Claris Lifesciences, under which the firm acquired the rights to 15 injectable products that have lost patent protection in major markets, covering a wide range of therapeutic areas including anti-infectives and pain management. The products will be marketed under the Pfizer brand in the US, where the deal is exclusive; Claris will continue to market the products elsewhere.

Citing these deals, Gupta says, "Deals in the injectables space have been mostly driven by objectives of capacity expansion, cost optimisation and technology acquisition, and the growing interest of international companies to acquire or collaborate with Indian companies."

Bibhuti Bhusan Kar, Program Manager, South Asia & Middle East, Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Frost & Sullivan, sings the same tune. He says, in addition to the above, low cost of production, and availability of low-cost scientific manpower are the core strengths of the Indian market which force MNCs to look for production partners to supply their injectable drugs in India and other parts of the world.

Adds Bhavesh Patel, Managing Director, Marck Biosciences says, the injectables business is highly capital intensive with a long gestation period. Therefore players look for collaboration in this area. He quips, "Even we are not averse to alliances. In fact in the pharma industry nowadays, it is very common to collaborate with competitors, suppliers and customers. We also have alliances with various companies within and outside India. In fact, we have filed our first ANDA with our partners in the US."

The scene in India

"The relatively exclusive segment of the generics market appears to be gaining traction, which has become evident with Hospira and Pfizer increasing their market shares by doing deals with Indian manufacturers"

- Sujay Shetty,
Associate Director, Pharma Practice, PricewaterhouseCoopers

"The rural market has tremendous growth potential, for several reasons-patients come at a late stage to the physicians and want to see instant results from a drug; higher margins are provided to the physicians for the injectable drugs; absence of adequately qualified physicians in the rural areas has led them to use injectables frequently to avoid any further complications of the disease. These reasons have attracted many smaller companies to enter the rural market to tap its potential"

- Bibhuti Bhusan Kar,
Program Manager,
South Asia & Middle East, Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Frost & Sullivan

Kar enumerates, "The Indian market is at an early stage of growth because of the low penetration of all healthcare needs, as compared to other parts of the world. Vaccination, patients receiving oncology treatment, usage of biologics are at nascent stages in India because of poor reimbursement policies, lack of government support, lack of awareness, and lower patient affordability, and thus there is a lot of opportunity for growth." He elaborates that the majority of the injectable drugs are sold on huge bonus offers and at discounted price. Moreover, a large portion of the market is hospital-based.

While changing lifestyle patterns have forced companies to tap cardiovascular diseases and diabetes segments more aggressively, Kar says that major markets for injectables/parenterals include vaccines, anti-infectives, oncology, biological, and nutritionals. Apart from these, several other drug classes such as insulins, drugs for pain management, CNS (Central Nervous System) drugs, and GI (Gastro Intestinal) drugs also contribute considerably to the injectable drugs market.

These things have jointly propelled the growth in this segment to be at or close to 15 percent over the last five years. However, "the booming vaccine market, growing at more than 20 percent in the last five years and with ample opportunities for further growth, is expected to favour the growth of the injectables market," says Kar.

And biotech drugs, which comprise two-thirds of the market, represent the biggest segment and are the fastest to grow at 15 percent, according to Gupta. Giving details, he says injectables using small molecules represent 25 percent of the market and are estimated to be at $35 billion, growing at 11 percent. But what is interesting is that most generic injectables use small molecules and are focused on oncology and cardiovasculars.

Though the market is highly fragmented there are small players as well as MNCs operating in this segment. But lacking capital, smaller domestic players are confined to market segments such as anti-infectives, GI and pain management drugs. Marck, however, focuses on a different league of products. Patel avers, "So far we have restricted our activities to respiratory solutions, ophthalmics and injectables in terms of therapeutics. Now we have augmented our capacities in large volume parenterals (LVP) as well as Small Volume Parenterals (SVP). Apart from fluid therapy and formulations, we have added ophthalmic, respiratory care and irrigation products by developing manufacturing capabilities. Today, we have the ability to offer six different therapeutic segments."

He continues, "So far we have grown in a very organic manner. We have never chased top line centric growth. We have been quite an inward looking organisation. We had Blow/Fill/Seal (BFS) technology only but now we are looking for anything which has synergy with BFS. We also have overseas companies approaching us for marketing tie-ups to launch in India. Marck's distribution network and hospital coverage attracts them. We have developed significant capabilities in terms of F&D, filings and our presence in various markets; as an extension to that now we are open to explore the opportunities available in the marketplace. Differently put, we would like to be a sterile dosage company and now we are looking at sterile drug systems other than BFS."

On the manufacturers' side, players would include Tablets India, Grandix, Lincoln Pharma, Noel Pharma, Molekule India, Martin Harris, Bombay Tablet, Synokem and others. However, in the formulations for vaccines, biologicals, and oncology drugs, large domestic companies and MNCs have a major share since the market is quality conscious and the products need technical expertise to manufacture and stock. Key players in this market segment are big size pharma companies and MNCs such as GSK, Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur, MSD, Serum Institute, Panacea Biotech, Shantha Biotechnics and so on.

"This market segment is growing healthily in terms of value because of the product differentiation and product benefit it offers to the patients," explains Kar.

A few collaborations
  • Panacea Biotec is associated with WHO for supplying polio vaccine throughout the world
  • Panacea also has a JV with Chiron which will strengthen their position in terms of technology to produce and market paediatrics combination vaccines in India
  • Bangalore based Strides Arcolab has acquired a sterile injectable manufacturing facility in Brazil to cater to the injectable market for infectious diseases globally
  • Strides Arcolab also has signed an agreement with Pfizer (the world's largest pharmaceutical company by value) to supply Pfizer's off-patent sterile injectables and oral drugs for the US market
  • Serum Institute has an agreement with the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) to develop, manufacture and sell meningitis vaccine
  • Shantha Biotechnics was taken over by Sanofi Pasteur (the vaccine division of Sanofi-Aventis) and was awarded a contract by the UN to supply pentavalent vaccine worth $340 million over the period 2010-12

Surging rural market

"Pens are finding increasing popularity to self-administer insulin in Europe. These devices are becoming more popular among diabetics in the US and this could find a niche market in India as well"

- Vikram Gupta,
Chief Operating Officer,
IndiaVenture Advisors

"With modernisation and new hospitals, the number of quality conscious customers who prefer to buy dependable parenteral products for their modern healthcare setup is steadily rising and will continue to rise for the next few years. Accordingly, the parenteral segment will enjoy excellent growth in the coming years. The key challenge, to emerge successful in this segment, is to provide consistent quality"

- Ketan Patel,
Managing Director,
Troikaa Pharmaceuticals

"The injectables business is highly capital intensive with a long gestation period. Therefore players look for collaboration in this area"

- Bhavesh Patel,
Managing Director,
Marck Biosciences

Though the urban setup is attractive and lucrative enough for major deals to make it through, the rural market is also up for a surge. As Kar rightly claims, "The rural market has tremendous growth potential for injectables in anti- infectives, GI segments and pain management drugs for several reasons-patients come at a late stage to the physicians and want to see instant results from a drug; higher margins are provided to the physicians for the injectable drugs; absence of adequately qualified physicians in the rural areas has led them to use injectables frequently to avoid any further complications of the disease. These reasons have attracted many smaller companies to enter the rural market to tap its potential."

Growth areas

Oncology drugs form one of the largest and fastest-growing sectors of the global generic injectables market, informs Shetty, highlighting the numbers. Annual sales of the global generic injectables sector were $10-12 billion in 2008, according to IMS Health, with injectable oncology medicines accounting for about 30 percent. Additionally, injectable oncology medicines worth $9 billion in annual sales are expected to lose patent protection by 2015. The other area that he feels will drive growth in the Indian market is the antibiotics segment, as the injectable antibiotics market in India has shown robust growth in the last four to five years. This, Shetty says, is due to the introduction of high-end antibiotic brands at higher prices and the subsequent proliferation of their generic versions. The domestic injectable antibiotics market is worth $425 million and has been growing at a Compounded Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 21 percent in the last three years. And so is Troikaa's focus on pain management, cardiology and nutraceuticals, to leverage the high potential that lies herein.

Gupta points to another growth area. He says, "It is also expected that there will be higher growth in the pre-filled and lyophilised products due to increasing demand for simplified processes at the point of care. The main challenge for pharma companies is to make these drugs easier to administer, safer, more reliable, and economical." Patel agrees that keeping in sync with the demand for certain products, "Marck is also looking at other products like lipids, and total parenterals nutrition, which will strengthen our IV parenterals formulation basket. Besides this, we are working on new drug delivery systems to facilitate treatment. This will be a first time offering to the medical fraternity."

The market for injectables in the antibiotics segment and particularly for cephalosporin has been growing significantly and there is a huge opportunity in the Indian market itself. The other market with huge potential is multivitamin injectables, as per Gupta. The size of the non-biological injectables market is estimated to reach about $80 to $100 billion in 2015, out of which generics could account for about $35 billion. It is estimated that from 2006 to 2009 patents expired on non-biological injectables worth $15 billion.

Collaborate to grow

The adage that adversity makes strange bedfellows is true of many industries and pharma is no exception. To cope with rising demand and increase their profit margins, Indian players have adopted the acquisition route to tap the world markets. The synergies that India has been boasting about for so long have once again taken the lead to bring in business. Due to a few factors like low cost of production and availability of adequately qualified manpower, Indian companies are able to manufacture and supply high volumes of parenteral drugs to the world market through JVs with MNCs/NGOs/international health organisations such as WHO, UNICEF and so on. More such JVs are expected in future, which will shape the injectables/parenterals market, opines Kar.

Coming soon

In recent past there has been double digit growth in market segments where injectables and parenterals are largely used such as vaccines, anti-infectives, oncology, biologic therapy, nutrition, pain management and so on. Most of these markets are growing at a rate close to or more than 20 percent, except for injectables in the antibiotic and pain management segment, which are growing at a rate close to 15 percent. These market segments are expected to grow at a similar rate in the coming three to five years, which will drive the usage of parenterals, feels Kar. However, Bhavesh Patel thinks that the injectables market is driven largely by private investment, the number of hospital beds, physicians, health insurance, corporate hospitals and patent infrastructure. According to a KPMG report, it is expected that two million hospital beds and 4,00,000 physicians will be added by 2015, which will set the market to grow. With this there will be an emergence of newer and more sophisticated devices, which are cost-effective, and safe for use, opines Gupta. He cites an example: "Pens are finding increasing popularity to self-administer insulin in Europe. These devices are becoming more popular among diabetics in the US and this could find a niche market in India as well."

Also, while healthcare service providers and insurance companies abroad continue to drive prices down, injectable products, because of their higher regulatory standards and the complexity of development or manufacturing process, tend to command higher margins and price stability as compared to oral products. It is therefore expected that this market will continue to attract pharma and biotech companies who will focus on new product innovation as well as cost-cutting to improve their overall profit margins, Gupta predicts. Ketan Patel, Managing Director, Troikaa Pharmaceuticals, concludes, "With modernisation and new hospitals, the number of quality conscious customers who prefer to buy dependable parenteral products for their modern healthcare setup is steadily rising and will continue to rise for the next few years. Accordingly, the parenteral segment will enjoy excellent growth in the coming years. The key challenge, to emerge successful in this segment, is to provide consistent quality." Another challenge that will be an opportunity for biological injectables developers, Gupta remarks, is the fragile nature of the biological drugs themselves, which requires they be transported and stored at low temperature-which adds to the cost of distribution. To avoid the problem of temperature-dependent stability, these drugs are often processed and packaged in dry or powder form. These trends indicate that over a period of time more players will emerge in this segment either as independent entities or collaboration that will bring new high-end products.

arshiya.khan@expressindia.com

- Source: Express Pharma, 1-15 May 2010; Express Healthcare, June 2010

- Link: http://www.expresspharmaonline.com/20100515/market01.shtml

http://www.expresshealthcare.in/201006/knowledge01.shtml

April 1, 2010

Indian oncology market likely to triple in 4 years


fe Bureaus
Posted: Thursday, Apr 01, 2010 at 2232 hrs IST
Updated: Thursday, Apr 01, 2010 at 2232 hrs IST
Mumbai: The oncology market in India is expected to touch nearly Rs 3,309 crore by 2014. According to a recent Frost & Sullivan report, the cancer market is expected to grow at a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 21% from 2008 to 2014. The growth will be driven by the introduction of new treatments, increasing number of patients on chemotherapy, and improved access to modern cancer therapies. The Indian oncology market stood at Rs 1,065 crore in 2008.

Deaths from lung cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer and pancreatic cancer are rising in India. Cancer accounts for 8% of the main causes of deaths in India.

Increased rates of incidence of various cancer types prevailing in India has created interest among various companies like BMS, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, GSK, SP Corporation, Fresenius Kabi, Natco Pharma, Sun Pharma, Dr Reddy's and Biocon to focus in the oncology segment. More than 30 companies in India market drugs for cancer treatment.

According to Bibhuti Bhushan Kar, program manager, pharmaceuticals and biotechnology, Frost & Sullivan, the major factors driving the oncology market include increasing patient population, combination therapy as standard therapy and novel high-cost therapy.

In males, lung cancer has the highest mortality rate of 28 per 10,000 males, whereas cervical cancer is found to be the most common cancer in females with a mortality rate of nearly 15 per 10,000 females. Lung cancer is also the most commonly diagnosed cancer in the world. Over 60,000 new cases are diagnosed every year and 80 % of patients are at an advanced stage, mostly the middle-aged and elderly.

Bibhuti Bhushan added: "New therapies to arrive on the market are priced in a much higher bracket because of their proven survival benefits and reduced toxicity. These therapies are preferred over generic drugs, thereby generating more revenues."

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 90% of all lung cancer. The primary cause of lung cancer in up to 90% of patients is tobacco. Lung cancer represents one-fifth of all cancer-related deaths in India.


- Source: The Financial Express, April 01, 2010

March 29, 2010

Analyst Briefing about Oncology Market

Frost & Sullivan Announces Analyst Briefing on Indian Oncology Market

NewswireToday - /newswire/ - Mumbai, India, 03/29/2010 - The Healthcare practice at Frost & Sullivan, a Growth Partnership Company is pleased to host an Analyst Briefing on the Indian Oncology Market. The presentation will be held on Tuesday, March 30 at 3:00 pm Indian Standard Time.

The latest research of Frost & Sullivan on 'Overview of Indian oncology market' presents an all-encompassing research of Oncology markets for various cancers: Breast cancer, Lung Cancer, Ovarian cancer, Prostate cancer, Head and Neck cancer, Cervical cancer, Renal cell carcinoma and Pancreatic cancer. The research focuses on pharmaceutical industry spending in various segments of cancer treatment. Cancer is the leading cause of death in India, so the Oncology therapeutic market is growing at a very high speed. The research study of this market represents the competition and strategic analysis of various segments of cancer market.

Oncology market is the most attractive and growing healthy. Most of the MNCs present capture maximum market share, but hardly anybody knows about the market and its dynamics. Most of the players are not sure about where the market is moving and each one is trying to increase its sales as maximum as possible.

Through this briefing, we shall present active reforms and recommendations that could be followed to plan out the strategy in the cancer market. The briefing, besides covering an analysis of the drivers and key constraints that affects growth of Oncology market, shall also cover the diseases including its impact on local and global scenario.

The briefing will benefit the API manufacturers, finished formulation manufacturers, marketers, decision makers, by discussing the market trends and future drivers in Indian context.

According to Frost & Sullivan Program Manager Bibhuti Bhusan Kar "Lack of any authenticated and audited data on the market, absence of any standardized treatment protocol, and increasing demand for newer and newer molecules for treatment has made the marketers to plan very wisely. Knowing the market better would solve the purpose."

To participate in this briefing, or for an interview, please email Anish Charles at anishc[.]frost.com with the following information: your full name, company name, title, telephone number, office email id, address, city, state, and country. Upon receipt of the above information, a registration link will be emailed to you. You may also register to receive a recorded version of the briefing at anytime by submitting the aforementioned contact details.

If you are interested in a virtual brochure, which provides manufacturers, end users, and other industry participants with an overview of the Indian Oncology Market in India, then send an email to Anish Charles / Nimisha Iyer, Corporate Communications, at anishc[.]frost.com / niyer[.]frost.com, with your full name, company name, title, telephone number, company email address, company website, city, state and country. Upon receipt of the above information, an overview will be sent to you by email.

Frost & Sullivan, the Growth Partnership Company, enables clients to accelerate growth and achieve best-in-class positions in growth, innovation and leadership. The company's Growth Partnership Service provides the CEO and the CEO's Growth Team with disciplined research and best-practice models to drive the generation, evaluation, and implementation of powerful growth strategies. Frost & Sullivan leverages over 45 years of experience in partnering with Global 1000 companies, emerging businesses and the investment community from 40 offices on six continents.


- Source: PR Newswire Today, 29 March 2010

- Link: http://www.newswiretoday.com/news/67488/

March 1, 2010

Pharma Logistics Supplement: Asian Potential




Bibhuti Bhusan Kar, program manager, Frost & Sullivan

Logistics providers can ride on the growth of Asia's expanding markets by offering reliable and efficient services in the transport, monitoring and storage of pharmaceuticals.
Monday, March 01, 2010
Email This | Printer Friendly

Program manager, pharmaceuticals and biotechnology, south asia & middle east, frost & sullivan the pharmaceutical industry is one of the few sectors that has been relatively resilient during the economic slowdown. Healthcare is typically one of the last areas where consumers cut spending. According to the world health organization, asia accounts for half of the world's population and has a significant market for novel drugs and improved healthcare systems.

In 2008, the global pharmaceutical market was worth us$773 billion, growing by about five percent over 2007, according to ims. The asia/africa/australia region has had the highest growth rate of 15.3 percent to us$90.8 over 2007, as compared to north america at 1.8 percent and japan at 2.1 percent.


pharmaceutical products need to be transported from the manufacturing site to the end user. However, unlike other types of products, pharmaceutical products need specialized transportation to maintain quality as many drugs are temperature, humidity and light sensitive. Any slight deviation in handling during transportation can cause degradation in the quality or potency of the drug.

Maintaining standards
drug manufacturers need to enforce the standards of good manufacturing practice (gmp) during manufacture to produce drugs in certain temperatures and humidity. This is the same for various other procedures such as quality control, packaging, storage, etc. Pharmaceutical companies have to follow stringent regulatory guidelines to obtain approval to market the drug.

The drugs manufactured are under scrutiny by the regulatory authorities to ensure quality. Any change in quality of the drug can be expensive to the manufacturer or the marketer of the product.

Certain medicine such as vaccines, biologics and certain ophthalmic preparations, require cold chain management from the site of manufacturing till it reaches and is used by the patient (end user). These drugs need special temperature controlled storage to maintain their quality and efficacy. They can become less effective or lose their potency if not stored properly throughout the distribution process. Generally, two temperature ranges are recommended for the cold chain products as per their labels - products requiring temperatures between 20c to 80c and those requiring a range of between -100c and -200c.

For example, sanofi-pasteur imports vaccines from a manufacturing site in france. The cold chain has to be maintained from that site to the end user in India, to ensure the potency of the drug - demonstrating the importance of logistics in the pharmaceutical distribution channel.

As drugs have a finite shelf-life, the time that is required for transportation is also an important consideration.

Competitive pressure
major markets in asia are driven by generic drugs and these drugs compete by price. The substitution of drugs is common where a particular product has become out of stock at the retail counter. It is important that the appropriate medicine and dosage is administered to the patient at the right place, time - and the right price.


pharmaceutical companies are increasingly under pressure for reasons such as lack of innovative molecules in the pipeline, increasing pressure from the government to reduce healthcare expenditure, and the rising cost of regulatory activities. Many companies have to slash operational costs and therefore reduce inventory levels at various stages of distribution. This is to reduce order cycle time and to increase efficiency. This further increases the requirements for an efficient and proper distribution system, to ensure just-in-time deliveries.

In some countries like India, there are a lack of regulatory standards and stringent norms for logistics. Many of the manufacturers transport the drugs through conventional methods such as trucks.

Also, certain drugs reach expiry in the market at the retail counter and are usually returned to the pharmaceutical companies for compensation with fresh products.

In countries such as India, the distribution channel is multilayered. At every level, there are associations comprising of stockists or retailers that decide on the products and usually demand higher profit margins. Pharmaceutical companies are not able to bypass the system and reach the customers directly.

In china however, the government has been able to implement reforms to flatten the distribution structure, reducing the overall cost of the supply chain.

In India, there are about 65,000 stockists and 550,000 retail outlets in the pharma industry, which has increased six- and fourfold respectively in the last 25-30 years. Similarly in china, there are close to 125,000 pharmaceutical retail outlets and more than 15,000 wholesale enterprises in the pharmaceutical distribution network. The accessibility of drugs to these entities is important, which means that logistics has to play a crucial role for just-intime deliveries and at the same time avoid stock outs.

The retail chains sector also looks promising. In India, retail chains such as religare wellness, reliance wellness, 98.4, the medicine shoppe, himalaya, guardian and others have been successful. From the logistics point of view this segment is likely to be lucrative as it requires efficient logistics solutions from third-party logistics service providers.

Regulatory challenges
stringent government regulations can create hurdles due to the documentation process. Especially pertaining to the import or export of the drugs, the documentation process can be time consuming. The time period also varies from country to country. Any issues in the documentation process will result in the materials being withheld for a longer period of time. However, well-trained logistics support from third-party vendors can be tapped on to take care of these issues.

The biotech industry in the region is in a nascent stage. However, in India and china, the growth of the industry is faster than those of other countries in the region. Biotech products require careful climate control throughout their transit period, which makes them vulnerable to spoilage during distribution. Therefore, the demand for well-trained and efficient logistics providers is high.

There are large untapped rural markets in countries like India and China. Most of the modern medicines today are not accessible by the rural population in India because the supply chain is unable to reach these areas. Close to 70 percent of India's population comprise the rural market which makes it a potentially lucrative market for pharma logistics players.

In addition, most multinational national corporations (mncs) are operating mainly in the metropolitan tier one and tier two cities in India. Because of the growing healthcare infrastructure in India and also across the region, there will be an increasing demand for drugs in previously untapped markets.

The clinical trials industry in asia and more specifically in china and India is growing rapidly. This is because of the cost competitiveness in the region, compared to western countries, and the presence of widely available disease profiles. In addition, the availability of treatment naive patients and skilled human resources are also contributing factors.

Medicines have to be transported to different patient centers or study sites across the country to be tested on various patients. As the transportation of medicines is subject to regulations, the existence of effective logistics is necessary.

In certain cases, batches of medicines may be required to be returned to the manufacturer from the market. In countries like India, a system is lacking for the recall of drugs, once the latter has entered the market. This is due to the fragmented nature of the distribution channel.

Technologies such as Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) can be used to keep track of the product along the entire distribution channel, and would prevent counterfeit drugs from entering the distribution system. However, the adoption of this technology in India is slow.

Potential for Expansion
in 2008, the global pharmaceutical logistics market recorded revenues of about us$90.3 billion, which included services such as freight, warehousing, and express logistics. According to Cygnus research, the market size of Indian pharmaceutical logistics was close to us$200 million in 2006 and the industry has been growing at a rate of four percent since 2002.

According to an estimate, logistics comprises of 45-55 percent of the costs in the pharmaceutical value chain. Based on a study in 2009, transportation is the biggest contributor to logistics costs, accounting for about 45.7 percent.

The next two biggest contributors to pharmaceutical logistics costs are warehousing and freight forwarding, which accounted for 33.2 percent and 15.0 percent respectively. Most of the industry participants also aim to further reduce their overall logistics costs by 1-5 percent in the next 1-2 years. Inbound or outbound transportation and freight forwarding are expected to be the most sought-after logistics services during this period.

Many pharmaceutical companies are constantly looking at enquiry code: 102s01 outsourcing their logistics operations to service providers that can offer them end-to-end supply chain solutions. There is an increasing trend in the usage of technologies in the logistics sector such as track and trace, fleet management, warehouse management and planning and forecasting tools.

Looking at the present scenario of the pharma industry and the increasing pressure to reduce the cost of operations, the following services are required from the logistics support suppliers by the pharmaceutical companies:

• cost effective cold chain distribution management;
• maintenance of humidity, temperature and light for drugs during distribution;
• strategies for an efficient distribution system for just-in-time deliveries and to avoid stock outs and drug substitution;
• value-added services during the documentation process to avoid any delay during the import and export processes;
• value-added services to match the needs of clinical trial distribution requirements;
• technology to prevent counterfeit drugs from entering into the supply chain;
• technology to track and trace the location of drugs in the distribution channel.

The use of technologies can further enhance the efficiency in daily operations for faster and more accurate delivery. Technologies like track and trace systems can also increase the visibility of logistics end users, allowing customers to track their shipment or package and to know when the delivery will be performed. Warehouse management systems are used by pharmaceutical manufacturers and distributors. There is also an increasing adoption of visibility tools like bar-coding/RFID systems.

- Source: PharmaAsia, singapore, March 01, 2010
link: http://pharmaasia.com/article-8358-pharmalogisticssupplementpharmalogisticsasianpotential-asia.html

September 10, 2009

Drug discovery paradigm shift

Nayantara Som
Thursday, September 10, 2009

A convergence between the pharma and biotech sector will gradually see both parties leveraging their strengths in drug development, commercialization, discovery and manufacturing capabilities thus delivering innovation and changing the whole landscape of M&A deals.


Global pharmaceutical companies have been swimming in troubled waters for quite some time but the good news is that they are now on the proactive mode.
Big pharma’s acquisition spree started making big news since 2008. In January 2009, Pfizer acquired biotech big-wig Wyeth for $68 billion, followed by Roche ending its long drawn hostile battle with Genentech by buying the remaining 44 percent stake, thus acquiring the latter for $46.8 billion. This was followed by Merck’s announcement in March to acquire Schering Plough for $41.1 billion. Other big deals include: El Lilly’s purchase of ImClone Systems last year, Japanese giant, Takeda Pharmaceutical’s acquisition of Millennium Pharmaceuticals and Cephalon’s takeover of Australia’s Arana Therapeutics.

Convergence is the trend
Analysts claim that convergence between pharma and biotech companies is not a new trend and will continue to do so. Sujay Shetty, associate director, Pharma Life Sciences Advisory, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), says, “From a global perspective, these big acquisitions have been taking place for the obvious reasons like the R&D pipeline drying up, and at the same time, biotech companies are either discovering a new molecule or a drug platform which could help replenish that pipeline. Deals like the Takeda-Millennium, ImClone-El lilly, Roche-Genentech will continue as long as big pharma sees the need to augment its pipeline which is not created in-house.”
Patent expirations will open the way for a fierce generic competition.
“A lot of drugs are going to be off patent in future and will face fierce competition from the generic companies, thus will marginally reduce the revenue of the pharma companies. Increasing issues on drug safety norms delaying entry of new drugs into the market due to the stringent regulations in the clinical trials are some of the other reasons for pharma and biotech companies coming together,” says Bibhuti Bhusan Kar, program manager, South Asia & Middle East, Healthcare –Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Frost & Sullivan. Hence, industry experts claim that convergence between the two will drive the wheels of the much needed innovation for the industry. It is a healthy market which will be the apt solution for big pharma’s reeling woes.
A PwC report on ‘Lifting big pharmas prospects with biologics’ , mentions that it will primarily be the biologics sector which will drive the M&A activity with protein-based therapeutics, MAbs and vaccines being hailed as promising sectors for growth. The same report also goes on to mention that in 2008, the therapeutic monoclonal antibodies sub-sector drew increased investment of $640 million in 46 deals, up from $477 million with 41 deals in 2007. Four of the top 10 human biotech deals in 2008, were companies focusing on therapeutic MAbs. It is also estimated that the market for MAbs is estimated to grow at a CAGR of 16.9 percent between 2006-12. Vaccines also drew in a considerable amount of investment of $494 million from 31 deals in 2008.
“In many therapeutic areas like CNS, Alzheimer’s and diabetes, we have seen that further meaningful innovation is not happening. Companies have been shifting their focus now on the root cause of any disease and understand the corrective measures to be taken more at the genetic level. Hence, a convergence between biotech and pharma will result in newer ways of finding curative therapies than the traditional synthetic ways,” opines Nair.
Moreover, maintaining an almost perfect balance between innovation on one hand and cost-efficiency on the other, it becomes the center of attention for strategy teams. Shetty mentions, “Pharma is on the lookout for new pipeline drugs. They have typically addressed that and are going out and buying companies. Companies are now saying that by 2012, they are to lose revenues and their scientists are not coming up with anything innovative. Therefore, buying a biotech company is the best option to keep those revenues flowing in.”
“As far as cost-reduction is concerned, pharma has got a huge infrastructure for R&D. Now there is a hope for them to do it more efficiently, not just in R&D but also for the ground level and fast-end clinical works,” he adds. To keep their business up and running, companies are now drawing up biological strategies which also include tapping emerging markets. The nature of competition is such that one day a company’s revenue might be $10 billion and with patent expiry, it is zero. “This does not happen in any industry. So the challenge is always on the innovation part of it, and cost comes after that,” observes Shetty.
The recent trend of convergence has thus changed the rules and landscape for M&A deals in the life sciences industry.
Sudeep Krishna, co-lead, Healthcare and Life sciences, Deloitte India, says, “The recent convergence trend has changed the rules of M&A activities, in the sense that traditionally we’ve seen that a pharma company acquires a biotech company having one or two blockbuster drugs with the deal around Rs 100-200 crore. Now, we see them acquiring big biotech companies having a whole pipeline of promising targets because big pharma has the money. The interesting aspect we’ve to look out for is the manner in which they integrate the entities especially the talent pool from both the entities.”

Impact of convergence
Drug innovation: With the convergence, the industry will now see a gradual blurring of boundaries between the biotech and pharma sectors. Such a convergence will open up avenues in the drug innovation process, the most obvious reason being that biotech companies whose forte has been innovation will replenish the drying up pipeline of pharma companies. “I think that drug innovation will go through a positive transformation. Now the cure will be much more holistic,” says Nair. Genentech for example, has cutting-edge products in both biotechnology and cancer medicines – with blockbusters
Avastin, which churned a revenue of around $2 billion last year and Herceptin, an extensive portfolio of new drugs.
Over the past one year, the number of FDA approvals for biologics has seen a gradual rise. For example, in 2008, there were 20 new molecular entity (NME) and four new biologics as compared to 16 NMEs and two biologics in 2007. Says Sanjay Singh, associate director, corporate finance, KPMG, “Biotech will aid significantly in drug discovery research especially in target identification, and lead generation and optimization activities.”
Moreover, big pharma companies are cash-rich companies. Hence, investing in expensive assets such as biologics is a risk they’re willing to take, considering the returns they’ll reap at the end.
“With biotech companies focusing on molecular biology and genetic engineering approaches, and with pharma companies being the lavish spender in R&D for drugs with basic chemistry one can expect a larger success rate in terms of output from the biotech drug development rather than pharma,” says Kar.
The whole process of drug innovation is an expensive one which does require a continuous inflow of monetary funds, and convergence will be a solution to the problem.
Licensing deals: Typically, a biotech company is always on the lookout for revenue churning options. So licensing deals are the answer to the question wherein a biotech company can expect an inflow of cash returns in the form of upfront payments, milestone payments and royalties. Opines Krishna, “Licensing deals between pharma and biotech companies have been happening for a long time and will continue to do so. In fact, I would say that it was these licensing deals which was a stepping stone for a convergence of such a kind.” “Biotech companies had to out-license their molecules because of their limited market access, and pharma companies in-licensed molecules from biotech companies which looked promising. Later pharma companies went a step further and thought why not go in for an acquisition of these entities,” he adds.
An important fact to bear in mind is that big pharma’s primary capability is commercialization while biotech strength lies in discovery and manufacturing. “Big pharma has much deeper pockets. In the present global economic environment, biotech, which has traditionally been a beneficiary of venture capital (VC) and government funding, will have challenge in keeping the fund flow. Hence, a natural consequence of this will be licensing deals which focuses on leveraging each others strength for the best outcome,” adds Nair.
Outsourcing: Outsourcing projects on the other hand will either see a status quo or a gradual increase but not drop. Opines Singh, “It’ll lead to outsourcing of high-end preclinical research to Indian companies, though it’ll be a slow and gradual process as Indian companies will need to demonstrate their skill and knowledge base in high-end preclinical research areas.” VCs will also have a pivotal role to play. The VC market has supported the growth of the outsourcing market due to the fact that there’s a significant risk involved in bringing a drug to the market.
Manufacturing: Manufacturing is another area which will see a positive transformation with biotech being a catalyst in the transformation. The dynamics of biotech manufacturing is different from pharma manufacturing, hence, the former will remain as a separate unit post-integration. “A convergence will lead to a need to invest in specialized, high-end fermentation and purification units,” says Singh.
At a closer look, a pharma company will reap more benefits than its biotech counterpart. “If you look at the top 10 pharma companies, they have all made biotech investments but their manufacturing capabilities are limited. Hence, a biotech manufacturing facility will be an additional and useful asset to a pharma company,” adds Krishna.
Biosimilars: With biosimilars being the buzz word, and some movement happening in the US Congress for a regulatory pathway, analysts and industry experts are hopeful that such a convergence might boost up the biosimilars space. Above all, an important fact to bear in mind is that all pharma companies have a generic strategy in hand, which will be a big boost for the biosimilar space.
According to Nair, “All the big pharma companies are talking about emerging markets and all of them have a generic strategy now. With generics being the focus for pharma companies, I see a collaboration here which will immensely benefit biosimilars. That’s because biosimilars have much better margins than other generics which will attract big pharma, even while big pharma’s commercialization capabilities will give the access and reach to biosimilars.”
Integrating the two entities: A major task in hand would be integrating assets of two entities which are in all aspects poles apart from each other. Experts have unanimously opined that companies will prefer to keep assets pertaining to R&D and manufacturing independently.
Ideally, when a pharma company takes over a biotech organization, they try and preserve the culture of the latter, which is more entrepreneur-driven and polished compared to a pharma organization which is more process driven. Integration will ideally be seen in the shared services, human resources and the financial services. The Roche-Genentech integration is an apt example. “Genentech is a fiercely independent company, and even after Roche taking over, its R&D unit has been kept independent,” says Krishna.
Singh opines that integration could happen at the sales force and manpower level. “I see integration will mainly happen at the manpower level and sales force to a certain extent. Manufacturing will be a separate unit because you’ll need a different technology. Also, there could be a synergy at the development and regulatory level,” he adds.

Company strategies
Pfizer, which has now set its foot in biologics has majorly revamped its business strategies. Following the Wyeth acquisition, it will establish a unique research model designed to advance the strong scientific capabilities of both Pfizer and Wyeth, and to support the new company’s nine diverse healthcare businesses. In order to maximize new opportunities in biopharmaceutical research, Pfizer will form two distinct research organizations —the PharmaTherapeutics Research Group and the BioTherapeutics Research Group. The PharmaTherapeutics Research Group will focus on the discovery of small molecules and related modalities and the BioTherapeutics Research Group will focus on large-molecule research, including vaccines. The new BioTherapeutics Research Group will capitalize on Wyeth’s industry-leading expertise in biologics and build on the momentum established by both Pfizer’s Biotherapeutics and Bioinnovation Center (BBC), and centers of large-molecule research and pharmaceutical science excellence in PGRD, which will be a part of the new and larger group. This new group’s mandate will be to create a broad and deep pipeline in vaccines, antibodies, proteins, peptides, nucleic acids and other novel modalities.
“Creating two distinct but complementary research organizations, led by the top scientist from each company, will provide sharper focus, less bureaucracy and clearer accountability in drug discovery,” says Jeff Kindler, CEO, Pfizer, in a press release. The new Pfizer will consist of nine diverse global healthcare businesses. The convergence between the two entities is aimed to capture key therapeutic areas such as cardiovascular, oncology, women’s health, CNS and infectious disease; vaccines, biologics and small molecules; and animal health with products for companion animals, consumer health, biologics and anti-infective. Going into emerging markets like China, Latin America and the Middle East is also on the cards.
In order to preserve the ‘biotech’ work culture of the company rather than diluting it, Genentech’s research and early development will operate as an independent center. At present, Genentech’s Avastin has been approved in the US and clinical trials are in progress to investigate the efficacy of Avastin in several other tumors. The synergy target increased to one billion Swiss francs annually, and a total one-time integration costs of approximately three billion Swiss francs has been alloted. The combined company has development portfolios with 10 new molecular entities in ongoing or planned late-stage clinical development.
Following the Eli Lilly-ImClone systems deal last year, their combined oncology portfolio will target a broader array of solid tumor types including lung, breast, ovarian, colorectal, head, neck, and pancreas, thus positioning Lilly to pursue treatments of multiple cancers. Partnering with ImClone will expand Eli Lilly’s biotechnology capabilities. “We think very highly of ImClone’s ground-breaking work in oncology, particularly its success with Erbitux(R), a blockbuster targeted cancer therapy, and its ability to advance promising biotech molecules in its pipeline,” says John C Lechleiter, president and CEO, Eli Lilly. This will also help them broaden their portfolio of marketed cancer therapies and boost Lilly’s oncology pipeline with upto three promising targeted therapies in phase III in 2009. By bringing together ImClone’s and Lilly’s oncology products, pipelines and biotech capabilities, the company is taking a step forward in addressing the challenges of patent expirations.
The combined entity of Merck and Schering-Plough will bring in a combined portfolio of products in key therapeutic areas which include cardiovascular, respiratory, oncology, infectious diseases, neuroscience and women’s health. Moreover, Merck will now get a footing in the emerging markets and hence devise a strategy accordingly for these markets because of the fact that Schering-Plough generates more than 70 percent of its revenues outside the US with around $2 billion in revenues coming in from these markets.
The Indian vaccine sector is a growing market and post Shantha-Sanofi deal, analysts predict that there will more such deals in this space to follow suit.

Challenges
Integration of assets of both the entities could be a challenge. Biotech is a different ball game and intellectually they’re different from their pharma counterparts. While biotech, which is still in developing stage, is science-driven, pharma is mainly commercialization-driven.
Kar says, “The biotech market is also much more concentrated than the pharma. “The biologics are costly as compared to the pharmaceuticals. We have to really see how pharma companies are moving ahead with the higher prices of biologics to make it a drug of choice, as the convergence will find the pressure both from the government and the consumer to slow down the growth of the healthcare costs,” Kar adds.

Looking ahead
With such a convergence, in the near future, one would see fewer pure biotech companies. “Pharma has the money, it has the need to reinvent itself and their solution being biotech and biotech has it own challenges. So, a convergence will be natural. Currently pharma and biotech is fairly distinctive and I see that line getting blurred,” adds Nair.
Singh maintains that a major trend would be companies would have a dedicated focus on biogenerics. “Another trend would be that within the fold of a pharma company there would be a separate business units which would focus on chemical as well as biopharma. The marketing strategies might differ because normally biological compounds are driven by value and not volume and there is a different logistics chain which is used for biological compounds,” he concludes.
Mixed reactions have emerged within the industry as to whether we can expect to see similar deals this year. There was talks of Pfizer buying out Biogen but the deal did not take off because of valuations. There were talks of Amgen being acquired as well as Bristol-Myers Squibb. “Small deals will continue to happen. However, I do not expect to see any big biotechs being up for sale. This is primarily because, they have the funds and are public entities,” said a research analyst. “ There are some big deals bound to happen this year. We can look out for some,” opines another analyst from a well-renowned firm.

- Source: BioSpectrum, Sept. 10, 2009
- Link: http://biospectrumindia.ciol.com/content/BioSpecial/10909102.asp